Intermediate and final results

 Top  Previous  Next

Team leader

Substitute

Specialist A

Specialist B

Specialist C

Team 1

.6

.3

1.0

.0

.0

Team 2

.3

.5

1.0

.5

.0

Team 3

.5

.4

.6

.4

.0

Team 4

1.0

.0

1.0

.0

.0

Team 5

.6

.5

.8

.0

.0

Team 6

.6

.0

.9

.2

.0

Team 7

1.0

.3

1.0

.3

.0

Team 8

.0 (Fred)

.0 (Tom)

.0 (Mike)

.0 (Walter)

.0 (Mandy)

Team 9

.7

.8

.0

.6

.4

Team 10

.0

.7

.6

.7

.0

Team 11

.8

.0

.8

.6

.0

Relevance

.6

.3

.7

.3

.0

 

From the intermediate results of the FACTORFINDER-Software team 8 can be identified as being ideal. From case-specific relevance values the software generates average values that describe the importance of the different positions for group performance. The most important position for success is specialist A, the least important is specialist C.